The Deception of the Anti-Christ removes Christ or opposes him.
ANTICHRIST EXPOSED
The only Bible writer to use the word “antichrist” is the apostle John. Note these words in the first letter bearing his name:
“Young children, it is the last hour, and just as you have heard that the antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have appeared, from which fact we know that it is the last hour. They went out from us, but they were not of our sort . . . Who is the liar but the one who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, the one who denies the Father and the Son.”—1 John 2:18, 19, 22.
Therefore, the Anti-Christ would come up with a Universal teaching that opposes Jesus as the Christ, the son of the living God. (Mathhew 16:16)
Thankful for Google transliterates יהוה in English as Jehovah. Visit JW.org about whom Jesus Christ calls the Only True God in (John 17:3)
Comments
-
We know from well-established OT and NT passages that Christ (Messiah) is God.
Jesus is Christ (Messiah); therefore, Jesus is God.
Those who deny that Jesus is the Christ (God), are anti-Christ. Pure and simple.
-
We know from well-established OT and NT passages that Christ (Messiah) is God.
Jesus is Christ (Messiah); therefore, Jesus is God.
Those who deny that Jesus is the Christ (God), are anti-Christ. Pure and simple.
Self contradicting non-sense ... obviously! There is no OT or NT passage that proclaims that the Messiah is God!
But, @Truth anonymous, just keep moving along in your ways ... you reveal the real you with each word.
-
Oh but there is.
-
The AntiChrist claims that Jesus is burning people in an eternal hell. This teaching came from the Hellenistic era that spread the demonic teaching from Greek Mythology into the Bible. Trintarian translators replaced the word Grave and placed hades in it's place. Today, this false catholic dogma is commonly known as hell and accepted by the various sects of Christendom, which is Satan's domain. It's a deceptive lie from the father of the lie.
Through a Bible Study, you too can learn the truth about the Dead.
-
And this assuring “message of peace” above comes from the same source that says:
“I grab you by the tail and horn and body slammed you.”
Why would a “Bible Study” from such a source be trustworthy?
I would also like to know the JW Bible study that supports judging and punishing others by body slamming them.
The artwork would be something to see.
-
This is what the true God, Jehovah, says, The Creator of the heavens and the Grand One who stretched them out, The One who spread out the earth and its produce, The One who gives breath to the people on it And spirit to those who walk on it:--Isaiah 42:5
Jehovah is close to the brokenhearted; He saves those who are crushed in spirit.--Psalm 34:18
Other translations:
Jehovah is nigh unto them that are of a broken heart, And saveth such as are of a contrite spirit.
Aramaic Bible in Plain English
LORD JEHOVAH is near to the broken hearted and he saves the meek in spirit.
YHWH [is] near to the broken of heart, And He saves the bruised of spirit.
Yahweh is near to those who have a broken heart, and saves those who have a crushed spirit.
Near is Jehovah to the broken of heart, And the bruised of spirit He saveth.
Jehovah is near to the broken of heart, and he will save the humble of spirit.
-
A word of caution that the same person who posts messages above might also grab you and body slam you as he claims to do to others.
Keep such theology and practice in mind.
Be not deceived.
-
The AntiChrist removes and deletes Jesus Christ placing its own doctrine ahead of Christ. The Catholic Encyclopedia, II, page 263: “The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son, and Holy Spirit by the Catholic Church in the second century.”
A word of caution, such poster rejects being baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. (Acts 2:38)
https://www.christiandiscourse.net/discussion/1014/a-closer-look-at-matthew-28-19
-
@BroRando posted:
The AntiChrist removes and deletes Jesus Christ placing its own doctrine ahead of Christ. The Catholic Encyclopedia, II, page 263: “The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son, and Holy Spirit by the Catholic Church in the second century.”
In addition to your most recent post in this thread, @BroRando, by my count you have included the same quotation from p.263 of The Catholic Encyclopedia II in these 15 other posts:
About the only items I ever quote in my posts are Bible texts and the posts to which I'm responding, so I'm not an expert on the use of quotations, but I do have some experience and facility with supporting my arguments. Among the lessons I've learned from that experience is that if you haven't made your point in 16 tries, you're probably not going to make it. So my question: What new benefit(s) do you expect to accrue from your latest and future uses of this quotation given the large number of posts in which you've already employed it?
-
It only offends one person. The AntirChrist.
The Catholic Encyclopedia, II, page 263: “The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son, and Holy Spirit by the Catholic Church in the second century.”
More articles that exposes the AntiChrist.
https://christiandiscourse.net/discussion/981/luke-23-43-and-its-meaning
https://christiandiscourse.net/discussion/986/the-trinity-and-it-s-false-theology
https://christiandiscourse.net/discussion/977/is-jesus-god
https://christiandiscourse.net/discussion/998/is-the-lexham-english-bible-a-trustworthy-bible
https://christiandiscourse.net/discussion/1001/why-do-jehovahs-witnesses-reject-blood-transfusions
https://christiandiscourse.net/discussion/1010/false-trinitarians-dangerous-falsehoods-they-teach
https://christiandiscourse.net/discussion/1021/christian-scriptures-that-stump-trinitarians
https://christiandiscourse.net/discussion/comment/21148#Comment_21148
https://christiandiscourse.net/discussion/1007/christ-divinity-explained-in-john-1-1c
https://www.christiandiscourse.net/discussion/1014/a-closer-look-at-matthew-28-19
-
@BroRando posted:
It only offends one person. The AntirChrist.
Thanks for this response, but I didn't ask you who might be offended by the 16 appearances made to-date in these forums of the quotation from The Catholic Encyclopedia II. I asked what new benefits you hoped to accrue from the latest and any future uses you make of the quotation given the large number of posts in which you've already used it. Hopeful that I have clarified the question I asked, I now ask it again.
-
For new readers of course. The Good News of God's Kingdom, not only is the spreading of good news, but the exposing false christendom doctrine. And I heard another voice out of heaven say: “Get out of her, my people, if you do not want to share with her in her sins, and if you do not want to receive part of her plagues." (Revelation 18:4)
-
@BroRando posted:
For new readers of course.
A few responses:
- CD forums don't welcome many "new readers." Check the "views" number of any thread launched in the last month for confirmation.
- Any genuinely new readers will likely quickly discover your repeated use of the quotation from p.263 of the Catholic Encyclopedia II and ask the same questions we "old readers" ask about the utility of such repetition.
- In addition, those new readers will note, as the rest of us have, that writ large, your posts come across as repetitive declarations of a small number of basic points: 1) Christ was "removed" from Mark 1.34; 2) The baptismal formula was changed away from "in the name of Jesus Christ" in the second century, according to The Catholic Encyclopedia II; and 3) Trinitarian theology is a "lie." Regardless of the merits of those claims, your continuous repetition of them, most often using material obviously pasted from other websites, comes across as weakness, not strength. I don't think this matters to you, but serial copying and pasting of the same content produces annoyance and frustration among those who read it, not changed hearts and minds.
-
Why did the chicken cross the road?
(This is only a test to see how JW Rando will respond)