Democratic socialist writer levels with voters: We want to ‘end capitalism’
The Democratic Platform of socialism just isn't what America wants.
The pile of waste accumulated by fake scientific interpretation of very good data is the fodder of the Party, adn indigestion has set in big time. For example:
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/10-failed-global-warming-predictions/
[I bet the FACTS from that internet-linked (utter fact for Bill) site will fuel some Billium--watch and see]
Comments
-
Looks clear that Republicans won again in OH over the massively failing Democrats. What is that, 8/9 seats so far?
Yeah. Thankfully America has stood up to liberal godlessness. At least with our God-given President we are making substantial progress. How long will God keep blessing Americans this way? Probably the few remaining “salty” Christians is the only reason why. -
@GaoLu said:
Looks clear that Republicans won again in OH over the massively failing Democrats. What is that, 8/9 seats so far?You have earned another Trumpster merit badge, Gao Lu!! Only the president's most avid lemmings will follow him off the cliff of the line of thinking you present here.
In 2016 - just 21 months ago - the Republican candidate in Ohio's 12th congressional district election won by nearly 37 points (66.6% v. 29.8%). IF the Republican candidate won Tuesday night's election this week, he won by less than one percentage point. A 36 point swing in less than two years is a political earthquake because there are DOZENS of GOP-held districts that are considered MORE competitive than Ohio 12.
That is, double-digit percentage swings, if they happen all over the country (as they have in this year's special elections) will take out LOTS of GOP incumbents.
That's big news to most politicos, but of course not to merit badge-earning Trumpsters.
Yeah. Thankfully America has stood up to liberal godlessness.
I have to admit that conservative godlessness IS much better.
At least with our God-given President we are making substantial progress. How long will God keep blessing Americans this way? Probably the few remaining “salty” Christians is the only reason why.
And how long will you continue to declare that you "don't care" for our "God-given President"?
-
@Bill_Coley said:
@GaoLu said:
Looks clear that Republicans won again in OH over the massively failing Democrats. What is that, 8/9 seats so far?You have earned another Trumpster merit badge, Gao Lu!! Only the president's most avid lemmings will follow him off the cliff of the line of thinking you present here.
In 2016 - just 21 months ago - the Republican candidate in Ohio's 12th congressional district election won by nearly 37 points (66.6% v. 29.8%). IF the Republican candidate won Tuesday night's election this week, he won by less than one percentage point. A 36 point swing in less than two years is a political earthquake because there are DOZENS of GOP-held districts that are considered MORE competitive than Ohio 12.
That is, double-digit percentage swings, if they happen all over the country (as they have in this year's special elections) will take out LOTS of GOP incumbents.
That's big news to most politicos, but of course not to merit badge-earning Trumpsters.
Yeah. Thankfully America has stood up to liberal godlessness.
I have to admit that conservative godlessness IS much better.
At least with our God-given President we are making substantial progress. How long will God keep blessing Americans this way? Probably the few remaining “salty” Christians is the only reason why.
And how long will you continue to declare that you "don't care" for our "God-given President"?
Can't really compare the special election turnout to the 2016 turnout. Special elections are even less of a turnout historically than mid-terms which are historically much lower than Presidential. That being said it is still a W in the R column.
-
@reformed said:
Can't really compare the special election turnout to the 2016 turnout. Special elections are even less of a turnout historically than mid-terms which are historically much lower than Presidential. That being said it is still a W in the R column.TRANSLATION: "Can't really compare election results that portend big losses for reformed's political party to 2016 because the 2016 results gave victories to reformed's political party, but the special election results don't. That being said, it is still a W in the R column... even though special election and public opinion poll results almost universally portend lots of Ls in the R column come the midterms."
-
@Bill_Coley said:
@reformed said:
Can't really compare the special election turnout to the 2016 turnout. Special elections are even less of a turnout historically than mid-terms which are historically much lower than Presidential. That being said it is still a W in the R column.TRANSLATION: "Can't really compare election results that portend big losses for reformed's political party to 2016 because the 2016 results gave victories to reformed's political party, but the special election results don't. That being said, it is still a W in the R column... even though special election and public opinion poll results almost universally portend lots of Ls in the R column come the midterms."
That's a liberal view of it. Not reality, but a view.
-
@reformed said:
@Bill_Coley said:
@reformed said:
Can't really compare the special election turnout to the 2016 turnout. Special elections are even less of a turnout historically than mid-terms which are historically much lower than Presidential. That being said it is still a W in the R column.TRANSLATION: "Can't really compare election results that portend big losses for reformed's political party to 2016 because the 2016 results gave victories to reformed's political party, but the special election results don't. That being said, it is still a W in the R column... even though special election and public opinion poll results almost universally portend lots of Ls in the R column come the midterms."
That's a liberal view of it. Not reality, but a view.
Of course mine's a liberal view, as yours is likely a conservative view. But I bet I'm more excited and optimistic about my party's chances in the midterms than you are about your party's chances.
At the moment, I'm predicting a 35-40 seat gain in the House for the Dems - with a chance that that number could increase markedly if the president's affect and behavior continue to darken as the Mueller team draws closer and closer to White House officials, the Trump family, and the Oval Office. (The seat gain number could instead decrease, of course, but the current momentum is strong, requiring something big to disrupt it.)
What's your current prediction for the House? We'll compare notes in November.
-
Bill, hear me. Republicans won. Democrats lost. And they keep on losing. There is a major shift in blacks and Hispanics increasingly supporting Trump as documented by your own chosen sources of truth, the hper-liberal twisted BILLIUM sites. Chew on that. Chew, baby chew. Go to your therapy group. If you need professional help, please let someone know.
-
@GaoLu said:
Bill, hear me. Republicans won. Democrats lost. And they keep on losing. There is a major shift in blacks and Hispanics increasingly supporting Trump as documented by your own chosen sources of truth, the hper-liberal twisted BILLIUM sites. Chew on that. Chew, baby chew. Go to your therapy group. If you need professional help, please let someone know.It's this kind of content in your responses to me, Gao Lu, that serves as an identity check: It assures me that the post indeed comes from you.
-
@Bill_Coley said:
@reformed said:
@Bill_Coley said:
@reformed said:
Can't really compare the special election turnout to the 2016 turnout. Special elections are even less of a turnout historically than mid-terms which are historically much lower than Presidential. That being said it is still a W in the R column.TRANSLATION: "Can't really compare election results that portend big losses for reformed's political party to 2016 because the 2016 results gave victories to reformed's political party, but the special election results don't. That being said, it is still a W in the R column... even though special election and public opinion poll results almost universally portend lots of Ls in the R column come the midterms."
That's a liberal view of it. Not reality, but a view.
Of course mine's a liberal view, as yours is likely a conservative view. But I bet I'm more excited and optimistic about my party's chances in the midterms than you are about your party's chances.
Actually I am not worried at all.
At the moment, I'm predicting a 35-40 seat gain in the House for the Dems - with a chance that that number could increase markedly if the president's affect and behavior continue to darken as the Mueller team draws closer and closer to White House officials, the Trump family, and the Oval Office. (The seat gain number could instead decrease, of course, but the current momentum is strong, requiring something big to disrupt it.)
I don't see them getting close to anything. They have nothing.
What's your current prediction for the House? We'll compare notes in November.
Republicans will hold the house.
-
Bill, Your Party boat is sinking. Leap off while you can unless you want to go down with the rest of the rats.
-
What's your current prediction for the House? We'll compare notes in November.
@reformed said:
Republicans will hold the house.We'll have something to post about on November 7.
-
@Bill_Coley said:
What's your current prediction for the House? We'll compare notes in November.
@reformed said:
Republicans will hold the house.We'll have something to post about on November 7.
